Ethics of gloating

You have a grievance against the deceased, so ask his family... Do not hurt them for an unclear reason. I do not know the correct action if you have a clear reason for hurting them, the important thing is that it is not due to a difference in points of view towards life!

His family will be hurt when he dies. They will wait for you to die to hurt your family. Or they will wait for a calamity to befall you so they can dance. And maybe they will bring out a dead person for you from the archives.

The picture is clear: one person gloats over another person's misfortune, the other waits until a misfortune befalls the first person and takes revenge.

Time is a wheel, and we are all dead.. and gloating over the pain of others upon death is one of the worst psychological innovations that man has come up with to feel victorious. “Glazing does not reach the dead, but it harms the living” and continuing the harm brings hatred in the future. Therefore, unexpected death is often an occasion to end disputes or an opportunity to start a new page, and a ritual to calm social problems when one of the conflicting heads dies.

Other people's pain is not suitable for belittling and gloating, or for joking and making fun of. Ethics say so. When it comes to well-known people and not public figures. When it comes to the details of public figures, I do not know the ethical behavior in this case. In some countries, the law allows the use of public figures in writing or employing them in fictional works in the manner the writer chooses. If we are to act, let it be between us, that is, we do not go with our gloating to the relatives of the one we gloat over. In any case, we cannot blame the people who received direct harm from the dead/loser, if they gloated, just as no one could blame the woman who screamed, in the hearing of the person who belittled her son's painful illness, so she replied when his only son fell ill:

Fart and fart.